Title: Anki Torah / Mishnayos
Tags: Terumah Terumah4 Terumah11 Terumah8 Terumah1 Terumah3 Terumah10 Terumah5 Terumah2 Terumah7 Terumah6 Terumah9
On every note of this deck, unless a note says otherwise:
Author: Rabbi Jonathan Fox

Front: A Jew appoints an imbecile to take terumah for him. Is the terumah valid?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 1:1

Front: A Jew appoints a gentile to take terumah for him. According to the Talmud Bavli, from which phrase in the Torah do we learn that the terumah is not valid?
Back: ‘you also’ – Bamidbar 18:28
Title: Terumah 1:1

Front: Why may a deaf person (who can speak) not separate terumah?
Back: Since one who takes terumah must recite a blessing that he can hear
Title: Terumah 1:2

Front: A person appoints a male child, who is 11 years and one day old and does not have two pubic hairs, to separate terumah on his behalf. According to Rebbi Yehudah, is his terumah valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 1:3

Front: A person appoints a male child, who is 11 years and one day old and does not have two pubic hairs, to separate terumah on his behalf. According to Rebbi Yossi, is his terumah valid?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 1:3

Front: ‘the age of vows’ – what is this age for a male?
Back: 12 years and one day
Title: Terumah 1:3

Front: ‘the age of vows’ – what is this age for a female?
Back: 11 years and one day
Title: Terumah 1:3

Front: A person separates olives as terumah for both his olives and his olive oil. According to Bet Shamai, is the terumah valid for the olives?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 1:4

Front: A person separates olives as terumah for both his olives and his olive oil. According to Bet Shamai, is the terumah valid for for the olive oil?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 1:4

Front: A person separates olives as terumah for both his olives and his olive oil. According to Bet Shamai, is the terumah valid for for the combination?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 1:4

Front: Based on what principle may one not separate terumah from peah in respect of tevel produce?
Back: One may not give terumah from the exempt for the liable
Title: Terumah 1:5

Front: Why may a drunken person not separate terumah?
Back: Because terumah must be selected from superior produce and a drunkard is unable to make this determination
Title: Terumah 1:6

Front: If a drunken person did separate terumah, is the terumah valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 1:6

Front: Why may a naked person not separate terumah?
Back: Because a blessing must be recited before terumah is taken. A naked person may not recite a blessing.
Title: Terumah 1:6

Front: If a naked person did separate terumah, is the terumah valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 1:6

Front: Based on which word in the Torah do we learn that terumah may not be separated by measure?
Back: ‘reckoned’ – Bamidbar 18:27
Title: Terumah 1:7

Front: If one separates terumah in a measuring basket, how must he do it?
Back: By not filling it
Title: Terumah 1:7

Front: A person separates terumah from wine for grapes that are due to be trodden. If the terumah taken falls into chullin, can the mixture be meduma?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 1:8

Front: A person separates terumah from wine for grapes that are due to be trodden. Must terumah be taken again?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 1:8

Front: If one separate olive oil as terumah in respect of olives that one intends to eat, must terumah be taken again?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 1:9

Front: True or false? One may separate terumah from unfinished produce for unfinished produce.
Back: FALSE
Title: Terumah 1:10

Front: According to the Tana Kama, why may one not, lechatchila, separate from the clean for the unclean?
Back: Generally, one is careful to maintain a distance between clean and unclean produce. As such, the Sages were concerned that one would end up separating from the distant for the close, which is prohibited.
Title: Terumah 2:1

Front: A heap of grain consists of clean and unclean produce. According to (a) the Tana Kama (b) Rebbi Eliezer, may one, lechatchila, separate from the clean for the unclean?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 2:1

Front: Why may one not separate terumah from unclean for clean?
Back: Because of the loss to the Kohen who may not eat unclean terumah
Title: Terumah 2:2

Front: A Levite separates terumat ma’aser from unclean tevel ma’aser in respect of clean terumat ma’aser. At the time he separated the terumat ma’aser he was unaware that it was unclean. According to the Tana Kama, is the terumat ma’aser valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 2:2

Front: A Levite separates terumat ma’aser from unclean tevel ma’aser in respect of clean terumat ma’aser. At the time he separated the terumat ma’aser he was aware that it was unclean. According to the Tana Kama, is the terumat ma’aser valid?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 2:2

Front: According to our Mishnah, if one willfully cooked on Shabbat, may he eat the cooked food on Shabbat?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 2:3

Front: According to our Mishnah, if one willfully cooked on Shabbat, may he eat the cooked food after Shabbat?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 2:3

Front: If one planted unintentionally during the shemitah year, must he uproot it?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 2:3

Front: May one separate terumah from barley for wheat?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 2:4

Front: May one separate terumah from fresh figs for dried figs?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 2:4

Front: From which verse in the Torah does Rebbi Yehudah learn that one must separate terumah from the superior quality produce even if it may ultimately result in a loss to the Kohein?
Back: ‘When you have set aside the best of it’ – Bamidbar 18:30
Title: Terumah 2:4

Front: In what way is a small whole onion of terumah superior to half a large onion of terumah?
Back: It keeps for longer
Title: Terumah 2:5

Front: In what way is half a large onion of terumah superior to a small whole onion of terumah?
Back: It is more presentable
Title: Terumah 2:5

Front: According to Rebbi Yehudah, why may one not separate terumah from village onions for town onions?
Back: Town onions are superior to village onions
Title: Terumah 2:5

Front: May one separate terumah from boiled wine for unboiled wine?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 2:6

Front: Produce A and produce B together constitute kilayim. Produce A is superior to produce B. May one separate terumah from produce A for produce B?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 2:6

Front: One gives terumah from darnel for wheat. Why is the terumah invalid?
Back: Because darnel is not food that is fit for human consumption
Title: Terumah 2:6

Front: A person separates a cucumber as terumah and the cucumber is found to be bitter. According to the Jerusalem Talmud, why must he give terumah again?
Back: Because it is doubtful whether the bitter cucumber is considered as food
Title: Terumah 3:1

Front: A person separates a jar of wine as terumah and it is found that it had turned into vinegar before he took it as terumah. If it falls into chullin, is the mixture meduma?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 3:1

Front: A person separates a jar of wine as terumah and it is found that it had turned into vinegar before he took it as terumah. Must he take terumah again?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 3:1

Front: A jar of terumah wine falls into chullin containing 5 times the wine. According to Torah law, is the mixture permitted to a non-Kohein?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 3:2

Front: A person separates a jar of wine as terumah and it is found that it had turned into vinegar but it is unknown whether it was still wine when terumah was taken. He therefore takes another jar of wine as terumah. The first jar falls into chullin containing less that 90 times the wine and the second jar falls into other chullin containing less that 90 times the wine. Which (if any) of the mixtures are meduma?
Back: None
Title: Terumah 3:2

Front: Reuvein and Shimon own a field in partnership. Reuvein separates 1/50th of the produce as terumah and thereafter, Shimon, unaware that Reuvein had separated terumah, also separates 1/50th of the produce as terumah. According to the Sages (as explained by Rebbi Yosi, whose (if any) terumah is invalid and why?
Back: Shimon’s, as it was separated in error
Title: Terumah 3:3

Front: A person appoints an agent to separate terumah on his behalf and subsequently annuls the agency. If he annuls the agency before the agent separates the terumah, is the terumah valid?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 3:4

Front: A person appoints an agent to separate terumah on his behalf and subsequently annuls the agency. If he annuls the agency after the agent separates the terumah, is the terumah valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 3:4

Front: Which type of workers do not require the owner’s explicit authority to separate terumah?
Back: Treaders of grapes in a winepress
Title: Terumah 3:4

Front: A person stands before a heap of produce and states ‘The terumah of this heap is within it’. According to Rebbi Shimon, may he separate terumah from another pile for this pile?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 3:5

Front: A person stands before a heap of produce and states ‘The terumah of this heap is within it’. According to the Sages, may he separate terumah from another pile for this pile?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 3:5

Front: A person stands before a heap of produce and states ‘The terumah of this heap from it is for it. According to Rebbi Elazar Chisma, is the terumah valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 3:5

Front: If one separates terumah before bikkurim, is the terumah valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 3:6

Front: The verse states ‘You shall not delay to offer the abundance of your fruits and of your liquors’. To what does ‘abundance’ refer?
Back: First fruits (bikkurim)
Title: Terumah 3:6

Front: The verse states ‘You shall not delay to offer the abundance of your fruits and of your liquors’. What does ‘liquors’ refer to?
Back: Terumah
Title: Terumah 3:6

Front: Where in the Torah is terumah referred to as ‘reishit’ (first)?
Back: ‘The reishit (first) of your corn’ Devarim 18:4
Title: Terumah 3:7

Front: ‘terumah precedes rishon’ – what does ‘rishon’ refer to?
Back: Maaser rishon
Title: Terumah 3:7

Front: In separating terumah, a person says ‘Let this be maaser’. Based on what rule, is the terumah invalid?
Back: His heart and mouth must agree
Title: Terumah 3:8

Front: True or false? Terumah that a gentile separates from his produce is not valid terumah.
Back: FALSE
Title: Terumah 3:9

Front: A gentile owns an orchard in Israel. According to the Sages, is he obligated in the laws of kerem revai?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 3:9

Front: A person separates 1 seahs of terumah from a heap containing 100 seahs of tevel produce. He intends to separate another seah later on. According to the Tana Kama, may he separate terumah from this pile of produce for another pile of tevel produce?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 4:1

Front: A person separates 1 seahs of terumah from a heap containing 100 seahs of tevel produce. He intends to separate another seah later on. According to Rebbi Meir, may he separate terumah from this pile of produce for another pile of tevel produce?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 4:1

Front: A person has produce in the store-house. He gives one seah to a Levite as maaser rishon and one seah to a poor man as maaser ani. According to Rebbi Meir, may he separate 8 seah to consume for himself and assume that the 2 seah separated are still in existence?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 4:2

Front: A person has produce in the store-house. He gives one seah to a Levite as maaser rishon and one seah to a poor man as maaser ani. According to the Sages, may he separate 8 seah to consume for himself and assume that the 2 seah separated are still in existence?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 4:2

Front: According to the Tana Kama, what is the measure of terumah (as a fraction of produce) for an average person?
Back: 1/40th
Title: Terumah 4:3

Front: According to Bet Shamai, what is the measure of terumah (as a fraction of produce) for an average person?
Back: 1/30th
Title: Terumah 4:3

Front: A person separates 1/60th of his produce as terumah. He subsequently discovers that the total amount of produce was 61 times the amount he separated for terumah. Is the terumah that he separated valid?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 4:3

Front: A person separates 1/60th of his produce as terumah. He subsequently discovers that the total amount of produce was 61 times the amount he separated for terumah. According to the Tana Kama, must he separate more terumah?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 4:3

Front: A person appoints an agent to separate terumah for him. The agent does not know how much the owner wants to be separated as terumah. How much should the agent set aside as terumah?
Back: 1/50th of the total produce
Title: Terumah 4:4

Front: A person appoints an agent to separate terumah for him. The agent knows that the owner usually separates 1/60th of his produce as terumah. The agent separates 1/50th. Is the separation valid and why?
Back: No. By failing to follow the owner’s practice, he has forfeited the owner’s authorization of him as his agent.
Title: Terumah 4:4

Front: According to Rebbi Eliezer, what is the maximum amount of terumah that one may give?
Back: 1/10th of one’s produce
Title: Terumah 4:5

Front: According to Rebbi Yishmael, what is the maximum amount of terumah that one may give?
Back: Half of one’s produce
Title: Terumah 4:5

Front: According to Rebbi Akiva, what is the maximum amount of terumah that one may give?
Back: Almost all of one’s produce
Title: Terumah 4:5

Front: There are 3 times when one measures the baskets for terumah. At which of these times do the baskets hold the least number of fruit?
Back: At the time of the first ripe fruits
Title: Terumah 4:6

Front: According to the Mishnah, which method of calculating fruit in a basket for terumah is the most praiseworthy and why?
Back: Weighing as it is the most accurate method
Title: Terumah 4:6

Front: A se’ah of terumah falls into 99 and a half se’ah and of chullin. According to Rebbi Eliezer is the mixture meduma?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 4:7

Front: A se’ah of terumah falls into 99 and a half se’ah and of chullin. According to Rebbi Yehoshua is the mixture meduma?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 4:7

Front: A se’ah of terumah falls into 99 and a half se’ah and of chullin. According to Rebbi Yosi ben Meshulam is the mixture meduma?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 4:7

Front: A black terumah fig falls into a mixture containing 70 white chullin figs and 40 black chullin figs. According to which Tana/s in our Mishnah, is the entire mixture permitted?
Back: Rebbi Yehoshua
Title: Terumah 4:8

Front: A terumah fig of unknown colour falls into a mixture containing 70 white chullin figs and 40 black chullin figs. According to which Tana/s in our Mishnah, is the entire mixture permitted?
Back: Rebbi Akiva and Rebbi Yehoshua
Title: Terumah 4:9

Front: A litra of dried terumah figs are pressed into a jar containing 100 litra of dried chullin figs. According to which Tana in our Mishnah, are the terumah figs annulled?
Back: Rebbi Eliezer
Title: Terumah 4:10

Front: A seah of terumah grain falls on top of a pile containing 100 seah of chullin grain. The owner skims 90 seah from the top of the pile. According to Rebbi Eliezer, is the terumah annulled?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 4:11

Front: A seah of terumah grain falls on top of a pile containing 50 seah of chullin grain. What should the owner do in order to ensure that the pile is free of terumah?
Back: He should skim the terumah from the pile
Title: Terumah 4:11

Front: A person has 2 baskets, each containing 50 seah of chullin grain. A seah of terumah falls into one of the baskets and it is unknown into which basket it fell. What must the owner do to enable him to consume the grain in both baskets?
Back: He must remove a seah of grain from either basket
Title: Terumah 4:12

Front: A bundle of vegetables, half of which is terumah and half chullin, falls into a pile containing 50 bundles of similar chullin vegetables. According to Rebbi Yosi, is the terumah annulled?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 4:13

Front: If a seah of unclean terumah falls into clean maaser rishon, what is the minimum amount of maaser rishon that would annul the terumah?
Back: 100 seah
Title: Terumah 5:1

Front: Is ‘the price of terumah’ generally cheaper than the price of chullin and why?
Back: Yes. Since it is only consumed by Kohanim, the demand is lower
Title: Terumah 5:1

Front: A seah of clean terumah falls into 50 seah of unclean chullin. Why may the Kohen consume the mixture in ‘small cakes’?
Back: By consuming cakes that are the size of half an egg, one ensures that no more than an egg’s volume of unclean chullin is mixed into any dough and that less than an egg’s volume cannot transmit impurity to other food
Title: Terumah 5:1

Front: A seah of unclean terumah falls into 100 seah of clean chullin. A seah must be taken out and given to the Kohen. According to Rebbi Eliezer, why may the Kohen not eat the seah?
Back: We assume that the seah that fell in is the seah that was removed
Title: Terumah 5:2

Front: A seah of unclean terumah falls into 100 seah of clean chullin. A seah must be taken out and given to the Kohen. According to the Sages, may the Kohen eat the seah?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 5:2

Front: A seah of clean terumah falls into 100 seah of unclean chullin. A seah must be taken out and given to the Kohen. List the ways that the Kohen may consume the seah.
Back: In small cakes; roasted; kneaded with fruit juice or divided among pieces of dough so that in no single place there is an egg’s bulk of unclean chullin
Title: Terumah 5:3

Front: According to Bet Hillel, is 1 seah of unclean terumah annulled in 100 seah of clean terumah. According to the Sages, must a seah be removed from the mixture?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 5:4

Front: ‘After they admitted’ – who admitted to whom?
Back: Bet Shamai admitted to Bet Hillel
Title: Terumah 5:4

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 199 seah of chullin. A seah is removed from the mixture and that seah falls into chullin. According to Rebbi Eliezer, what is the minimum amount of chullin in the second mixture that would annul the seah that fell in?
Back: 100 seah
Title: Terumah 5:5

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 199 seah of chullin. A seah is removed from the mixture and that seah falls into chullin. According to the Sages, what amount of the seah is considered to be terumah?
Back: 1/200th
Title: Terumah 5:5

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 39 seah of chullin. One seah from that mixture falls into chullin. According to Rebbi Eliezer, what is the minimum amount of chullin in the second mixture that would annul the seah that fell in?
Back: 100 seah
Title: Terumah 5:6

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 39 seah of chullin. One seah from that mixture falls into chullin. According to the Sages, what is the minimum amount of chullin in the second mixture that would annul the seah that fell in?
Back: 2 and a half seah
Title: Terumah 5:6

Front: ‘drawn water renders the mikveh unfit only proportionately’ – what is the law that the Mishnah is teaching us in the name of the Sages
Back: Three logs of drawn water disqualify a deficient mikveh only if they fell in out of three or fewer vessels
Title: Terumah 5:6

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 100 seah of chullin. A seah is then removed from the mixture and given to the Kohen. Another seah of terumah falls in and is removed and given to the Kohen. Is the mixture permitted to a non-Kohen?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 5:7

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 100 seah of chullin. Before a seah could be removed from the mixture, another seah of terumah falls in. According to Rebbi Shimon, is the mixture permitted and why?
Back: Yes. When the first seah falls in, it is annulled and the mixture is now considered to contain 101 seah of chullin, which annuls a seah of terumah that falls in
Title: Terumah 5:8

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 90 seah of chullin. The mixture is ground. Since the chullin is superior to the terumah, the chullin increases but the terumah stays the same. When the seah fell in, did it render the mixture meduma?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 5:9

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 90 seah of chullin. The mixture is ground. Since the chullin is superior to the terumah, the chullin increases but the terumah stays the same. Did the grinding render the entire mixture permissible?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 5:9

Front: A seah of terumah falls into 99 seah of chullin. Thereafter, a seah of chullin is deliberately added into the mixture. Given that one seah of terumah should be annulled in 100 seah of chullin, why is this mixture forbidden?
Back: The Sages penalized the person for deliberately voiding a restriction?
Title: Terumah 5:9

Front: A non-Kohen inadvertently eats a sela’s worth of impure terumah. What is the value of the produce that must he pay to the Kohen?
Back: One and a quarter sela
Title: Terumah 6:1

Front: A non-Kohen inadvertently eats a sela’s worth of impure terumah. May he pay the Kohen with terumah produce?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 6:1

Front: A non-Kohen inadvertently eats a sela’s worth of impure terumah. May the Kohen refuse to accept payment?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 6:1

Front: The daughter of an Israelite inadvertently eats 4 dinar of terumah before a Kohen had acquired the terumah. Before paying for her error, she marries a Kohen. Why may she pay the 5 dinar to herself?
Back: If this terumah had remained in existence, she would not have to give it to a Kohen but could eat it herself.
Title: Terumah 6:2

Front: The daughter of an Israelite inadvertently eats 4 dinar of terumah that had been acquired by Reuvein the Kohen. Before paying for her error, she marries a Kohen. What is the value of the produce that she must pay to Reuvein?
Back: 4 dinar
Title: Terumah 6:2

Front: The daughter of an Israelite inadvertently eats 4 dinar of terumah that had been acquired by Reuvein the Kohen. Before paying for her error, she marries a Kohen. What is the value of the produce that she may pay to herself?
Back: 1 dinar
Title: Terumah 6:2

Front: A non-Kohen host inadvertently gives terumah food to his non-Kohen guests, who eat the terumah inadvertently. According to Rebbi Meir who must pay the capital value to a Kohen?
Back: The host
Title: Terumah 6:3

Front: A non-Kohen host inadvertently gives terumah food to his non-Kohen guests, who eat the terumah inadvertently. According to the Sages, who must pay the capital value to a Kohen?
Back: The guests
Title: Terumah 6:3

Front: A non-Kohein steals 20 seah of terumah and inadvertently eats it. Assuming that a seah of terumah costs 10 dinar and a seah of chullin costs 12 dinar, how much must he pay in total?
Back: 460 dinar
Title: Terumah 6:4

Front: ‘he pays two-fifths’ – what is each of the two fifths for?
Back: One for eating terumah and one for eating hekdesh
Title: Terumah 6:4

Front: A person unwittingly eats terumah. According to Rebbi Meir, he may not pay for his error from peah. From which phrase in the Torah does he derive this?
Back: ‘the holy thing’ – Vayikra 22:14
Title: Terumah 6:5

Front: A person unwittingly eats terumah. According to Rebbi Meir, he may not pay for his error from peah. According to Rebbi Yochanan in the Jerusalem Talmud, doe the Sages agree with this ruling?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 6:5

Front: A person inadvertently consumes terumah figs. According to Rebbi Eliezer, he does not have to pay the Kohen with figs. According to Rebbi Akiva, he must pay the Kohen with figs. Explain how Rebbi Eliezer derives this from the phrase ‘the holy thing’ (Vayikra 22:14).
Back: Rebbi Eliezer - He may pay back with anything that may become holy
Title: Terumah 6:6

Front: A person inadvertently consumes terumah figs. According to Rebbi Eliezer, he does not have to pay the Kohen with figs. According to Rebbi Akiva, he must pay the Kohen with figs. Explain how Rebbi Akiva derives this from the phrase ‘the holy thing’ (Vayikra 22:14).
Back: Rebbi Akiva – He may only pay back with that which is similar to that which is holy (i.e. the figs in this case)
Title: Terumah 6:6

Front: A person willfully, but without warning, eats 100 dinars worth of terumah. How much must he pay the Kohen?
Back: 100 dinar worth
Title: Terumah 7:1

Front: A person willfully, but without warning, eats 100 dinars worth of terumah. Why may the Kohen forego the repayment?
Back: The repayment is considered chullin
Title: Terumah 7:1

Front: A Kohen has a daughter who is married to a mamzer. According to Rebbi Meir, she is liable to pay the fifth for unwittingly eating terumah as she is considered a ‘stranger’ to terumah as stated in the verse (Vayikra 22:13). According to Rebbi Meir, why is she considered a ‘stranger’ to terumah?
Back: By marrying a mamzer, she is disqualified from ever eating terumah in the future
Title: Terumah 7:2

Front: A Kohen has a daughter who is married to a mamzer. According to Rebbi Meir, she is liable to pay the fifth for unwittingly eating terumah as she is considered a ‘stranger’ to terumah as stated in the verse (Vayikra 22:13). According to the Sages, why is she not a ‘stranger’ to terumah?
Back: Because she has eaten terumah in the past
Title: Terumah 7:2

Front: For each of the following, explain why one is exempt from the payment of a fifth: feeding terumah to a slave.
Back: A slave does not have possessions and thus cannot repay
Title: Terumah 7:3

Front: For each of the following, explain why one is exempt from the payment of a fifth: eating terumah from outside Israel.
Back: This is only a rabbinical prohibition
Title: Terumah 7:3

Front: For each of the following, explain why one is exempt from the payment of a fifth: eating less than an olive’s bulk of terumah.
Back: This is not considered ‘eating’
Title: Terumah 7:3

Front: State a general rule to determine whether the repayment for terumah is considered chullin.
Back: Whenever the repayment is for the capital and not for the fifth, the repayment is considered chullin
Title: Terumah 7:4

Front: There are two baskets, one containing terumah and one containing chullin. A seah of terumah falls into one of the baskets but it is unknown into which basket it fell. A non-Kohen goes ahead and eats from one of the baskets. Is he liable to pay the additional fifth and why?
Back: No, since he may have eaten chullin
Title: Terumah 7:5

Front: There are two baskets, one containing terumah and one containing chullin. A seah of terumah falls into one of the baskets but it is unknown into which basket it fell. A non-Kohen goes ahead and eats from one of the baskets. According to Rebbi Yosi, is the produce in the other basket liable to challah?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 7:5

Front: There are two baskets, one containing terumah and one containing chullin. A seah of terumah falls into one of the baskets but it is unknown into which basket it fell. A non-Kohen goes ahead and eats from one of the baskets. If another Kohein eats produce from the other basket, is either of them liable for the additional fifth?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 7:5

Front: There are two baskets, one containing terumah and one containing chullin. One of the baskets falls into chullin and the other falls into other chullin. Which of the mixtures is rendered meduma?
Back: Neither
Title: Terumah 7:6

Front: There are two baskets, one containing terumah seeds and one containing chullin seeds. A person sows the seeds from one of the baskets but does not know whether they were from the chullin or the terumah. According to Rebbi Meir, are the seeds in the other basket liable to challah?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 7:7

Front: There are two baskets, one containing terumah seeds and one containing chullin seeds. A person sows the seeds from one of the baskets but does not know whether they were from the chullin or the terumah. According to Rebbi Yosi, are the seeds in the other basket liable to challah?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 7:7

Front: There are two baskets, one containing terumah seeds and one containing chullin seeds. A person sows the seeds from both baskets. In what circumstance is the product of all the seeds permitted?
Back: If the seeds are perishable
Title: Terumah 7:7

Front: A woman, the daughter of an Israelite, is married to a Kohen. She is informed that her husband has died. She realizes that she had eaten terumah since the time her husband died. According to which Tana is she exempt from paying back and what is his reason?
Back: Rebbi YehoshuShe is treated as one who made an unavoidable mistake as opposed to an inadvertent one
Title: Terumah 8:1

Front: A Kohen discovers that he has a physical defect (mum). Are all the sacrifices that he had offered prior to the discovery of the mum, valid?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 8:1

Front: A Canaanite slave who has a Kohen master, is eating terumah when he is informed that his master has died. According to Rebbi Eliezer, may he swallow that which is in his mouth and why?
Back: Yes, since his initial eating is lawful
Title: Terumah 8:2

Front: A Canaanite slave who has a Kohen master, is eating terumah when he is informed that his master has died. Does Rebbi Yehoshua agree with Rebbi Eliezer that you can swallow what is in his mouth since his initial eating is lawful?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 8:2

Front: While eating terumah, a Kohen realises that the terumah was unclean before he started eating. According to Rebbi Yehoshua, must he spit out the food in his mouth?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 8:2

Front: While eating terumah, a Kohen realises that the terumah was unclean before he started eating. According to Rebbi Eliezer, must he spit out the food in his mouth?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 8:2

Front: A person was casually eating a cluster of tevel grapes, which had not yet become liable to tithing. He then stepped into his courtyard. Why must he stop eating the grapes in the courtyard?
Back: When the grapes come into the courtyard, they become liable for tithes
Title: Terumah 8:3

Front: May a person eat tevel produce, which had not yet become liable to tithing, on Shabbat?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 8:3

Front: Chullin wine that was left uncovered must be poured away. Why?
Back: Out of concern that a snake drank from it and poisoned it. By pouring it away, one prevents people from drinking or using the wine.
Title: Terumah 8:4

Front: Chullin wine that was left uncovered must be poured away. Does the same apply to terumah wine?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 8:4

Front: According to the Tana Kama, what quantity of uncovered water may be consumed?
Back: An amount that is at least sufficient to offset the snake venom that may be in the water
Title: Terumah 8:5

Front: A person is about to eat a large fig that has been gnawed on one side. Assuming that the fig has moisture, may he eat the part of the fig that is not gnawed?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 8:6

Front: True or false? A kosher animal that was bitten by a venomous snake may be consumed if slaughtered properly.
Back: FALSE
Title: Terumah 8:6

Front: According to which Tana, does the venom of a snake pass through an uncovered wine strainer into the vessel below?
Back: Rebbi Nechemya
Title: Terumah 8:7

Front: A doubt arose regarding the cleanness of a jar of terumah wine in a hidden place. According to Rebbi Yehoshua, it should put in an exposed place to render it definitely unclean when it may be burned. Why is it preferable to burn it than to leave it in its state of doubt?
Back: Lest it be inadvertently consumed
Title: Terumah 8:8

Front: A jar of clean terumah wine was broken in the upper part of a wine-press. The wine is flowing into the lower press, in which there is unclean chullin wine that is less than a hundred times the terumah wine in the jar. The person on hand cannot find a clean vessel. Which Jews will be able to consume the wine in the lower press if the terumah wine falls into it?
Back: None
Title: Terumah 8:9

Front: A jar of clean terumah wine was broken in the upper part of a wine-press. The wine is flowing into the lower press, in which there is unclean chullin wine that is less than a hundred times the terumah wine in the jar. The person on hand cannot find a clean vessel. Rebbi Eliezer, should he collect the terumah wine in unclean vessels in order to save the chullin wine?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 8:9

Front: A jar of clean terumah wine was broken in the upper part of a wine-press. The wine is flowing into the lower press, in which there is unclean chullin wine that is less than a hundred times the terumah wine in the jar. The person on hand cannot find a clean vessel. According to Rebbi Yehoshua, should he collect the terumah wine in unclean vessels in order to save the chullin wine?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 8:9

Front: A jar of clean terumah oil is spilling. The person on hand has one clean vessel and many unclean vessels. He can save either all the oil in the unclean vessels or one revi’it in the clean vessel. What should he do?
Back: He should save the one revi’it in the clean vessel
Title: Terumah 8:10

Front: A gentile sees a Jew walking with loaves of bread. The gentile tells the Jew to give him one loaf to render unclean and if the Jew refuses, he says he will touch all the loaves and render them unclean. According to Rebbi Eliezer, what may the Jew do to save the other loaves from becoming unclean?
Back: Nothing
Title: Terumah 8:11

Front: A gentile sees a Jew walking with loaves of bread. The gentile tells the Jew to give him one loaf to render unclean and if the Jew refuses, he says he will touch all the loaves and render them unclean. According to Rebbi Yehoshua, what may the Jew do to save the other loaves from becoming unclean?
Back: He may put one loaf on a stone in front of the gentile
Title: Terumah 8:11

Front: Gentiles capture a group of women and demand that they hand over one woman to be defiled and if the women refuse, they say they will defile all the women. May they hand over one woman to save the rest?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 8:12

Front: A person inadvertently sowed terumah. Assuming that it has not yet grown one-third what must he do?
Back: He must plow it over
Title: Terumah 9:1

Front: A person inadvertently sowed terumah. Assuming that it has already grown one-third, what must he do?
Back: He must let it grow
Title: Terumah 9:1

Front: Which type of terumah seeds may not be left to grow if sown willfully?
Back: Flax
Title: Terumah 9:1

Front: A field is willfully sown with terumah seeds and is left to grow. According to Rebbi Tarfon, why may poor non-Kohanim gather from the peah of the field and sell their gleanings?
Back: We are concerned that may forget that the produce is terumah and inadvertently consume it
Title: Terumah 9:2

Front: A field is willfully sown with terumah seeds and is left to grow. Does the Tana Kama agree with this restriction?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 9:2

Front: A field is willfully sown with terumah seeds and is left to grow. The owner gives maaser ani from the produce to a poor non-Kohen. What must the recipient do with the produce?
Back: He must sell it to a Kohen at the price of terumah
Title: Terumah 9:3

Front: A field is willfully sown with terumah seeds and is left to grow. Why should the owner preferably not thresh the field?
Back: He will have to muzzle his animal to prevent it from eating the produce of the field
Title: Terumah 9:3

Front: For each of the following state whether it is treated as terumah: (a) the product of terumah (b) the product of the product of terumah (c) the product of meduma (d) the product of Firstfruits (e) the product of hekdesh
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 9:4

Front: A hundred beds of chullin and one of terumah are sown in a field and it is unknown which bed is of terumah. Under what circumstance is all of the produce forbidden?
Back: If the seeds are of a kind that does not disintegrate
Title: Terumah 9:5

Front: In what circumstance is the produce of tevel seeds forbidden?
Back: If the seeds are of the kind that does not disintegrate
Title: Terumah 9:6

Front: May a Jew eat a chance meal from the tevel produce of a gentile in Israel?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 9:7

Front: Terumah seedlings that became unclean, are replanted. May their produce be consumed by Kohanim?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 9:7

Front: Terumah seedlings that became unclean, are replanted. Do they convey uncleanness?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 9:7

Front: A person puts a whole terumah onion into a dish of cooked chullin lentils. May a non-Kohein eat the lentils and why?
Back: Yes, as the onion does not impart flavour to the lentils
Title: Terumah 10:2

Front: A person puts a cut-up terumah onion into a dish of cooked chullin (which is neither lentils nor pickled fish). According to Rebbi Yehudah, may a non-Kohein eat the chullin and why?
Back: No, as the onion imparts flavour to the chullin
Title: Terumah 10:2

Front: A grated terumah apple is put into chullin dough and the apple leavens the dough. Why is the dough forbidden to non-Kohanim?
Back: Since it was leavened by terumah
Title: Terumah 10:2

Front: A warm chullin barley bread is taken out of the oven and placed over the mouth of a terumah jar of wine. According to which Tana/s is the bread permitted to non-Kohanim?
Back: Rebbi Yehudah
Title: Terumah 10:3

Front: Does the Tana of this Mishnah hold that ‘aroma has substance’?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 10:4

Front: A fenugreek of maaser sheini falls into a wine vat of chullin. The whole fenugreek (including the stalk) is just sufficient to impart its flavour to the wine. May the wine be consumed outside Jerusalem?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 10:5

Front: Are fenugreek stalks included in the prohibition of kilayim?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 10:6

Front: Is a person obligated to separate terumah from the stalks of fenugreeks?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 10:6

Front: According to Bartenura, what is ‘terumah water’?
Back: Water in which terumah olives had been pickled
Title: Terumah 10:7

Front: One pickles whole chullin olives with crushed terumah olives. Are the chullin olives permitted to non-Kohanim and why?
Back: Yes because whole olives emit flavour but do not absorb flavour
Title: Terumah 10:7

Front: One pickles unclean fish with clean fish in salt. According to the Tana Kama, what is the minimum fraction of unclean brine relative to the total amount of brine that renders all the brine forbidden?
Back: 1/960th
Title: Terumah 10:8

Front: One pickles unclean fish with clean fish in salt. According to Rebbi Yehudah, what is the minimum fraction of unclean brine relative to the total amount of brine that renders all the brine forbidden?
Back: 1/192nd
Title: Terumah 10:8

Front: One pickles unclean fish with clean fish in salt. According to Rebbi Yosi, what is the minimum fraction of unclean brine relative to the total amount of brine that renders all the brine forbidden?
Back: 1/16th
Title: Terumah 10:8

Front: Unclean locusts are pickled with clean locusts. According to the Tana Kama, does the brine of the unclean locusts render the brine mixture forbidden?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 10:9

Front: Unclean locusts are pickled with clean locusts. According to Rebbi Tzadok, does the brine of the unclean locusts render the brine mixture forbidden?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 10:9

Front: Terumah vegetables are pickled with chullin vegetables. List two circumstances when the terumah vegetables be forbidden to non-Kohanim?
Back: If the terumah vegetables are leeks; If the terumah and chullin vegetables are leeks
Title: Terumah 10:10

Front: Chullin vegetables are stewed with terumah beets. According to Rebbi Yosi, is the chullin permissible to non-Kohanim and why?
Back: No as the beets impart flavour to other vegetables when stewed together
Title: Terumah 10:11

Front: ‘Liver renders forbidden but is not rendered forbidden’ – why is liver not rendered forbidden?
Back: Since it exudes blood and as a result, does not absorb
Title: Terumah 10:11

Front: If an egg is cooked with forbidden spices, is it rendered forbidden?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 10:12

Front: Why may one not put a terumah fig-cake into fish brine?
Back: This spoils the fig-cake, which is discarded and one may not cause terumah to be spoiled
Title: Terumah 11:1

Front: May one treat terumah wine with honey and spices?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 11:1

Front: According to the Tana Kama, may one boil terumah wine?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 11:1

Front: According to Rebbi Yehudah, may one boil terumah wine?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 11:1

Front: Date-honey that was made from terumah dates, is inadvertently consumed. Why does Rebbi Yehoshua exempt the consumer from repaying the added fifth?
Back: The status of terumah fruit drinks differs from the actual terumah fruit
Title: Terumah 11:2

Front: According to Rebbi Eliezer, is apple-wine made from terumah apples, susceptible to impurity?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 11:2

Front: Which terumah fruits may be intentionally changed into liquids?
Back: Grapes and olives
Title: Terumah 11:3

Front: May one bring apple juice as bikkurim?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 11:3

Front: With which offering is oil offered on the altar?
Back: The mincha offering
Title: Terumah 11:3

Front: May a non-Kohen eat the stalk of a terumah carob?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 11:4

Front: A Kohen has kernels of terumah. At what point do such kernels become permitted to non-Kohanim?
Back: When the Kohen throws them away
Title: Terumah 11:5

Front: A Kohen is permitted to throw away the course bran of terumah. Why is this not considered destroying terumah?
Back: Since it is indigestible, it is not regarded as destroying terumah
Title: Terumah 11:5

Front: When a person clears his store-room of terumah, may he sweep the terumah out as he would do with chullin?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 11:6

Front: A jar of terumah oil spills. Must one scoop it up manually?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 11:7

Front: A person pours terumah wine from a jar into another jar. He continues pouring until 3 drops (that generally remain after emptying a vessel) have dripped out. May he put chullin wine into the jar, out of which he has poured, and consume it despite the fact that there was terumah residue in the jar?
Back: Yes
Title: Terumah 11:8

Front: ‘An eighth of an eighth’ – how many logs is this?
Back: 1/64th of a log
Title: Terumah 11:8

Front: A Kohen may generally not feed terumah to his animals. Why then may a Kohen feed his animals vetches of terumah?
Back: The restriction only applies to produce that mainly serves humans. Vetches, however, mainly serve animals.
Title: Terumah 11:9

Front: A Kohen hires a cow from a non-Kohen. May he give the cow vetches of terumah to eat?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 11:9

Front: What is ‘shemen serefah’?
Back: Terumah oil that became unclean
Title: Terumah 11:10

Front: May a non-Kohein kindle ‘shemen serefah’ for his own benefit?
Back: No
Title: Terumah 11:10

Front: Which Tana/s permit the kindling of ‘shemen serefah’ in a house of mourning?
Back: Rebbi Yosi and Rebbi Shimon
Title: Terumah 11:10

Front: According to Rebbi Meir, why is it prohibited to kindle ‘shemen serefah’ in a house of feasting?
Back: In the merriment, one may forget and move the lamp to another place
Title: Terumah 11:10